Point de vue sur le nouveau programme en « Sciences de la nature » dans l'enseignement collégial au Québec / The new science's program in Québec colleges: a point of view
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les enseignants de sciences des collèges québécois appliquent depuis la rentrée 1999 le nouveau programme «Sciences de la nature». Nous présentons ci-dessous le contexte dans lequel ils doivent travailler depuis la mise en place de «l’approche programme» et de «l’approche par compétences». Ces approches résultent de l’application à l’enseignement collégial, des mesures prises lors du renouvellement de l’ensemble des programmes. Nous décrivons par la suite les principales caractéristiques du nouveau programme et soulevons quelques questions au regard des changements que les enseignants de sciences devront apporter à leurs pratiques pédagogiques. Finalement, nous indiquons quelques pistes à privilégier afin que les étudiants développent les compétences qui les rendront aptes à relever les défis d’un monde où les technosciences sont omniprésentes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".