Bibliographic record
Abstract
Статья посвящена атрибуции золотого перстня с изображением на щитке безбородого обнаженного юноши c диадемой на голове и венком – в обеих опущенных вниз руках. Перстень был найден в 2018 г. в заглубленном в грунт помещении из сырцового кирпича (святилище № 835). И форма перстня, и стиль изображения на его щитке не оставляют никаких сомнений в датировке перстня позднеархаическим временем, скорее всего, около рубежа 6–5 вв. до н. э. Сюжет, представленный на щитке перстня, чрезвычайно редок и практически не имеет параллелей в глиптике, на произведениях которой рассматриваемого времени чаще всего венки изображались в руках Эрота. Тем не менее, параллели в чернофигурной вазописи дают основание скорее связывать изображение обнаженного безбородого юноши в диадеме, с венками в опущенных руках с мотивами педерастического круга или связанными с симпосием, нежели спортивного. В подобной интерпретации греческого украшения нет, собственно, ничего удивительного, за исключением того, что нам открываются новые грани жизни греческого населения позднеархаической Фанагории (в том случае, если имела место первая версия). The article is devoted to the attribution of a golden finger ring with the image of a beardless nude youth with a diadem on his head and two wreaths – each in every hand, lowered down, on the bezel. The finger ring was found in 2018 in a room made of mud bricks (sanctu ary no. 835) under the stone foundation of a temple in Phanagoria. Both the shape of the ring and the style of the image on its bezel leave no doubt about the dating of the ring to the Late Archaic period, most likely around the turn of the 6th–5th centuries BC. The subject, presented on the ring’s bezel, is extremely rare and has practically no parallels in glyptics – in the items dated to the period under consideration, wreaths were most often depicted in the hands of Eros. Nevertheless, the parallels in the black-figure vase painting give reason to associate the image of a naked, beardless young man in a diadem, with wreaths in lowered hands with motives of a pederastic circle or those associated with a symposium, rather than sports. In such an interpreta tion of a Greek piece of jewelry there is, in fact, nothing surprising, except that new facets of the life of the Greek population of the Late Archaic Phanagoria are revealed to us (in the event that the first version of interpretation is correct).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".