MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383888270 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102093

Improving outcomes for First Nations mothers and babies in Australia through culturally safe continuity of midwifery care: the time for scale-up is now!

2023· article· en· W4383888270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helen McLachlan, Michelle Newton, Fiona McLardie-Hore, Pamela McCalman, Della Forster

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilLa Trobe University
KeywordsMedicineScale (ratio)ObstetricsNursingContinuity of careFamily medicineHealth careLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Australia is one of the safest places in the world to give birth. This is not the case for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter called First Nations) peoples.1 First Nations women are three times more likely to die in childbirth than non-First Nations women, and their babies are almost twice as likely to die in their first year of life. Preterm birth (birth before 37 completed gestational weeks) and being low birthweight (<2500 g) are also both substantially higher for First Nations babies, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207