MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383889003 · doi:10.15866/ireaco.v16i2.23120

Medium and Low-Level Energy Saving Control Strategies for Electric-Powered UAVs

2023· article· en· W4383889003 on OpenAlexaff
Zeinab Hussein Keserwani, Majd Saied, Clovis Francis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Automatic Control (IREACO) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionEnergy (signal processing)Controller (irrigation)MinificationElectric energy consumptionMATLABPoint (geometry)Energy minimizationElectric vehicleControl (management)Computer scienceEngineeringDroneAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)SimulationElectric energyArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flight endurance of an electric-powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is restricted by its limited on-board energy, which might endanger the accomplishment of any mission it has been sent on. Therefore, the vehicle’s energy consumption should be reduced as much as possible to prolong its flight. This paper deals with the minimization of the energy consumed by an electric-powered UAV as it tracks a desired target point by designing the necessary energy saving control techniques. Two approaches are proposed. The first one addresses the energy consumption problem by optimizing the UAV’s low-level controller. The second approach makes use of the powerful Artificial Bee Colony algorithm to optimize the medium-level controller which guarantees not only target point tracking but also minimization of energy consumption. The effectiveness of both proposals is validated by simulations on MATLAB/Simulink.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of Automatic Control (IREACO)Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207