Investigating microglia-neuron crosstalk by characterizing microglial contamination in human and mouse patch-seq datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microglia are cells with diverse roles, including the regulation of neuronal excitability. We leveraged Patch-seq to assess the presence and effects of microglia in the local microenvironment of recorded neurons. We first quantified the amounts of microglial transcripts in three Patch-seq datasets of human and mouse neocortical neurons, observing extensive contamination. Variation in microglial contamination was explained foremost by donor identity, particularly in human samples, and additionally by neuronal cell type identity in mice. Gene set enrichment analysis suggests that microglial contamination is reflective of activated microglia, and that these transcriptional signatures are distinct from those captured via single-nucleus RNA-seq. Finally, neurons with greater microglial contamination differed markedly in their electrophysiological characteristics, including lowered input resistances and more depolarized action potential thresholds. Our results generalize beyond Patch-seq to suggest that activated microglia may be widely present across brain slice preparations and contribute to neuron- and donor-related electrophysiological variability in vitro .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".