MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scalable Dialysis-Based Method for the Isolation of Strontium from Milk for Radioanalysis

2023· article· en· W4383895775 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Cooke, Pawel Czechura, Matthew Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Food Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrontiumChromatographyStrontium-90Certified reference materialsChemistryMaterials scienceDetection limitRadionuclideOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide An ashless dialysis-based method for the convenient and timely removal of strontium from milk for radioanalysis has been described for samples ranging from 100 to 500 mL following a brief (30 min) treatment with formaldehyde solution. Overall strontium recovery is suitably high and remarkably consistent across all sample sizes (81–84%), with the final isolation of strontium from milk comfortably achieved within 32 h. For strontium carrier quantification and quality assurance purposes, two chromatographic high-pressure ion chromatography methods were developed to fully resolve strontium from the cationic mineral constituents of milk, as well as yttrium, while method validation was performed with a certified reference material (IAEA-152 milk powder) containing strontium-90. This methodology is highly amenable to concurrent multisample processing which, considering its scalability, makes it well-suited to environmental surveillance of radiostrontium in milk for both routine and emergency response applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Food Science & TechnologySame topicRadioactive contamination and transferFrench-language works237,207