MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4383900930 · doi:10.7365/jhpor.2013.4.6

Cost-effectiveness of injectable atypical long-acting antipsychotics for chronic schizophrenia in Poland

2013· article· en· W4383900930 on OpenAlexaff
M. Hemels, Roman Zilbershtein, A Schubert, Iwona Skrzekowska-Baran, K. Van Impe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Policy & Outcomes Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisperidoneMedicinePaliperidone PalmitateAntipsychoticCost effectivenessQuality of life (healthcare)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Quality-adjusted life yearPediatricsEmergency medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In order to determine the cost-effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI), a long-acting injectable formulation, indicated for once-monthly injections as antipsychotic therapy, it was compared with risperidone, a long-acting, injectable (RLAI) and biweekly agent, administered for treatment of chronic schizophrenia in Poland, as perceived from the perspective of the National Health Fund (NHF). Methods: We adapted a 1-year decision tree model to the Polish healthcare system with literature-derived and clinical expert inputs. The compared drugs included PP-LAI, a new treatment option of antipsychotic therapy, and RLAI, the established treatment for Polish patients. Clinical rates were derived from published trials. Model outputs included expected cost per patient, as well as the rates of hospitalization, emergency room visits, days free of symptoms and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). One-way sensitivity analyses were applied to major inputs. All the inputs were also simultaneously varied in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Despite its higher acquisition cost, PP-LAI demonstrated a lower expected cost per treated patient. PP-LAI was associated with 0.824 QALYS, 323 days with stable disease and 44.6% hospitalization. RIS-LAI had 0.817 QALY, 317 stable days and 51.3% hospitalization. PP-LAI dominated RIS-LAI in the base case and in 55.0% of 10,000 simulations, and was cost-effective in 76.6%. However, the cost-effectiveness was sensitive, being lost with modest increases for PP-LAI or decreases for compared drugs with respect to their prices, relapse and adherence rates. Because it is injected monthly as opposed to biweekly, PP-LAI saves caregiver time as it is administered monthly, as opposed to the biweekly regimen. Conclusions: From the viewpoint of the National Health Fund of Poland, when compared with RLAI, PP-LAI is a cost-effective drug with potential to reduce healthcare expenses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health Policy & Outcomes Research→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→