MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383906681 · doi:10.1080/17686733.2023.2232586

The registration of multi-modal point clouds for industrial inspection

2023· article· en· W4383906681 on OpenAlex
Parham Nooralishahi, Sandra Pozzer, Gabriel Ramos, Fernando López, Xavier Maldague

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudModalComputer sciencePipeline (software)Benchmark (surveying)Point (geometry)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionData processingComponent (thermodynamics)Remote sensingGeographyMathematicsGeodesyMaterials scienceDatabaseGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a complete solution for multi-modal inspection of industrial components, including a processing pipeline for registering consecutive multi-modal point clouds comprising thermal and visible sensors’ data. A comparative evaluation of optimisation and learning-based registration methods is provided as part of the processing pipeline. Moreover, a benchmark dataset of point cloud data from different FOVs of industrial and construction component samples is provided (LeManchot-Points), having data from five point clouds with depth, colour and thermal information at each point. The experimental campaign with different objects demonstrates the proposed solution’s applicability for the multi-modal inspection of industrial components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it