Planejar o pré-natal, parto e pós-parto: possibilidades no enfrentamento à violência obstétrica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Discutir as potencialidades e os desafios do plano de parto para construção do cuidado humanizado com ênfase na prevenção da violência obstétrica. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo que analisa narrativas de mulheres que planejaram seus partos, por escrito e de modo verbal, e também que não o planejaram. Resultados: Como resultado, foram analisadas potencialidades do planejamento de parto, com destaque para ampliação da percepção da violência obstétrica e sua prevenção. Além disso, evidenciaram-se lacunas como o não planejamento do puerpério e a necessidade de avançar com o plano de (pós) parto. Conclusão: O “Plano de Parto e pós-Parto” mostra-se como ferramenta para a prevenção da violência obstétrica e pode garantir a qualificação do cuidado no puerpério às mulheres que sofreram violência obstétrica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".