MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383907966 · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02356-z

Haplotype-resolved chromosomal-level assembly of wasabi (Eutrema japonicum) genome

2023· article· en· W4383907966 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hiroyuki Tanaka, Tatsuki Hori, Shohei Yamamoto, Atsushi Toyoda, Kentaro Yano, Kyoko Yamane, Takehiko Itoh

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsHaplotypeGenomeBiologyGeneticsComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Japan, wasabi (Eutrema japonicum) is an important traditional condiment, and is recognized as an endemic species. In the present study, we generated a chromosome-level and haplotype-resolved reference genome for E. japonicum using PacBio CLR (continuous long reads), Illumina, and Hi-C sequencing data. The genome consists of 28 chromosomes that contain 1,512.1 Mb of sequence data, with a scaffold N50 length of 55.67 Mb. We also reported the subgenome and haplotype assignment of the 28 chromosomes by read-mapping and phylogenic analysis. Three validation methods (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs, Merqury, and Inspector) indicated that our obtained genome sequences were a high-quality and high-completeness genome assembly. Comparison of genome assemblies from previously published genomes showed that our obtained genome was of higher quality. Therefore, our genome will serve as a valuable genetic resource for both chemical ecology and evolution research of the genera Eutrema and Brassicaceae, as well as for wasabi breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207