MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383908736 · doi:10.3390/risks11070126

Cox-Based and Elliptical Telegraph Processes and Their Applications

2023· article· en· W4383908736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRisks · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipseTelegrapher's equationsStochastic processProcess (computing)MathematicsPosition (finance)Line (geometry)Probability density functionStatistical physicsMathematical analysisCalculus (dental)PhysicsGeometryComputer scienceTelecommunicationsStatisticsTransmission line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies two new models for a telegraph process: Cox-based and elliptical telegraph processes. The paper deals with the stochastic motion of a particle on a straight line and on an ellipse with random positive velocity and two opposite directions of motion, which is governed by a telegraph–Cox switching process. A relevant result of our analysis on the straight line is obtaining a linear Volterra integral equation of the first kind for the characteristic function of the probability density function (PDF) of the particle position at a given time. We also generalize Kac’s condition for the telegraph process to the case of a telegraph–Cox switching process. We show some examples of random velocity where the distribution of the coordinate of a particle is expressed explicitly. In addition, we present some novel results related to the switched movement evolution of a particle according to a telegraph–Cox process on an ellipse. Numerical examples and applications are presented for a telegraph–Cox-based process (option pricing formulas) and elliptical telegraph process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it