MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383955895 · doi:10.54503/0135-0536-2023.2-241

Տղամարդու կերպարը Հմայակ Հակոբյանի դիմանկարներում

2023· article· ru· W4383955895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Արմինե Պետրոսյան

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical-Philological Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitPaintingSoulArmenianArtQuarter (Canadian coin)Art historyVisual artsHistoryPhilosophyAncient historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В многожанровом творчестве известного живописца конца XIX ‒ первой четверти ХХ века Амаяка Акопяна (1871–1939), внесшего неоценимый вклад в развитие армянского реалистического портретного жанра, особое место занимают мужские портреты (живопись и графика). Его портреты отражают как человеческие типажи, так и эпоху, в которой он жил и создавал свои полотна. Персонажами портретов являются люди разных национальностей и культур. Это психологические портреты, раскрывающие пласты человеческой души. In the multi-genre art of the famous painter of the late 19th and the first quarter of the 20th century, Hmayak Hakobyan (1871–1939), who made an invaluable contribution to the development of the Armenian realistic portrait genre, male portraits (painting and graphics) occupy a special place. His portraits reflect both human types and the era in which he lived and created his canvases. The characters of the portraits are people of different nationalities and cultures. These psychological portraits reveal the layers of the human soul.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical-Philological JournalSame topicLegal and Regulatory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207