MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383956364 · doi:10.1080/15361055.2023.2214701

Evaluation of Environmental Tritium Activity Levels and the Impact on the Public Health Around the Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant after 25 Years of Operation

2023· article· en· W4383956364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFusion Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental radioactivityNuclear power plantEnvironmental monitoringEnvironmental impact assessmentNuclear powerRadionuclideRadiation monitoringEnvironmental protectionQuality assuranceEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringOperations managementNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), the only CANDU (CANada Deuterium Uranium) technology in Europe, is located in the southeast of Romania at the confluence of the Danube River and the Danube–Black Sea Channel, about 60 km from the Black Sea (Constanta County) and about 160 km from Bucharest. The Cernavoda NPP has two operating units of 700 MW(electric) and produces about 20% of the electric power of Romania (Unit 1 since December 1996 and Unit 2 since November 2007). The Environmental Control Laboratory (ECL) of the Cernavoda NPP, located in Cernavoda town 2 km from the Cernavoda NPP, is part of the Radiation Protection Department and is equipped with performant analyzing systems to determine the natural and artificial radionuclide levels in the environmental samples within a 30-km area around the Cernavoda NPP.The Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring Program for the Cernavoda NPP started in 1996, and all necessary activities are performed in the ECL, which has a quality assurance program according to the appropriate international standards and is participating in many intercomparison exercises and proficiency tests to validate the analyzing methods and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the environmental program, as a mandatory condition in the certification of the ECL and the reauthorization process of the Cernavoda NPP by the Romanian regulatory body, National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control. The annual report contains all the results for the environmental radioactivity monitoring and effluent monitoring; the results of the monitoring program are annually compared with the results of the Preoperational Environmental Monitoring Program performed between 1984 and 1994. This paperwork presents the evaluation of tritium activity levels in environmental samples around the Cernavoda NPP and the impact on the public health after 25 years of operation (1996 to 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it