Timely Status Update in Relay-Assisted Cooperative Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the age of information (AoI) of relay-assisted cooperative communication systems. For time-slotted systems without relaying, prior works have shown that the source should generate and send a new packet to the destination every time slot to minimize the average AoI, regardless of whether the destination has successfully decoded the packet in the previous slot. However, when a dedicated relay is involved, whether the relay can improve the AoI performance requires an in-depth study. Depending on whether the source and the relay are allowed to transmit simultaneously, two relay-assisted schemes are investigated: time division multiple access (TDMA) and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) schemes. In TDMA, the source generates and sends a new packetevery other time slotto avoid possible simultaneous transmission with the relay. In NOMA, the source generates and sends a new packetevery time slot, thus possibly forming simultaneous transmission from the relay and the source. A key challenge in deriving their theoretical average AoI is that the destination has different probabilities of successfully receiving an update packet in different time slots. We model each scheme using a Markov chain to derive the corresponding closed-form average AoI. Interestingly, our theoretical analysis indicates that the relay-assisted schemes can only outperform the non-relay scheme in average AoI when the signal-to-noise ratio of the source-destination link is below$-2\,\text{dB}$dB. Furthermore, comparing the merits of relay-assisted schemes, simulation results show that the TDMA scheme has a lower energy consumption, while the NOMA counterpart typically achieves a lower average AoI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".