Alexithymie, distorsions cognitives et violence sexuelle sur mineurs : une étude exploratoire [Alexithymia, Cognitive Distortions and Child Sexual Offending: An Exploratory Study].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude porte sur le traitement de l'information chez des auteurs de violence sexuelle (AVS) sur mineurs à la fois sur le plan cognitif, avec les distorsions cognitives, et sur le plan émotionnel, avec l'alexithymie.La recherche a été menée sur 20 hommes auteurs de violence sexuelle sur mineurs.Un questionnaire autorapporté a servi à mesurer l'alexithymie et les distorsions cognitives.Les résultats soulignent des niveaux élevés d'alexithymie et de distorsions cognitives.Les AVS en milieu fermé ont un score significativement plus élevé sur le facteur émotionnel de l'alexithymie que les AVS en milieu ouvert.Les données semblent indiquer des déficits dans le traitement de l'information sociale chez les AVS sur mineurs.Cette étude souligne l'importance d'adapter l'offre de soins en fonction des déficits, mais également du lieu de prise en charge et des ressources des patients. Mots-clés : violence
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".