THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY THROUGH COMMUNICATION: THE SCRUM MODEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The digital revolution, often referred to as the third industrial revolution, began with the shift from analog and mechanical devices to digital technology in the second half of the twentieth century. It enabled the market to respond rapidly to customer preferences and implement changes according to market conditions and business environments. In this era of digital revolution, Agile development has become highlyvalued among organizations as they need to innovate faster than ever before to survive and thrive in an ever-changing and competitive business climate and respond to marketplace changes by developing new and innovative products, modernizing existing ones, or shifting business models. Without organizational agility, they risk being left behind or becoming obsolete. Amidst these challenges, the Agile paradigm, a product development approach that addresses business agility and deals with rapid change, rose from the software development industry. There are various types of Agile frameworks that help organizations become more agile, with Scrum being the most widely used. Scrum is a framework in product development that helps people, teams, and organizations generate value as they navigate through complexities. While many organizations in information technology, banking, insurance, healthcare, fuel, energy, and power generation are adopting Scrum, some still find it challenging to embrace it to improve their agility. In this research, I aimed to discover how organizations can better adopt an Agile mindset to keep up with the digital revolution. I conducted a comprehensive study on organizational agility and the Scrum framework and analyzed how both relate to three fundamental communication theories: Theory of Diffusion of Innovation, System Theory, and Behavioral Theory. Through sensemaking, I studied organizations that have adopted Scrum and examined why Agile is vital to organizations, what hinders organizations from adopting the Agile mindset, and how Scrum can help organizations adopt the agility mindset. Additionally, through a case study, I explored how Scrum can be used as a communication tool among geographically distributed teams. In this research, I discovered three essential factors in the successful adoption of organizational agility, namely, (1) principles and praxis; (2) mindset and behavior; and (3) innovation. These three pillars have one crucial aspect in common: communication. The results of my research show that these factors will help organizations in the paradigm shift from traditional product development to a more value-driven approach. Using the lenses of the Interpretative School and Montreal School of Thought in organizational communication, the results also support the premise that acts of communication in the Scrum Model can improve agility in organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".