Theoretical, on-ground, and in-flight study of the Metis coronagraph vignetting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On-board the Solar Orbiter ESA/NASA mission there is Metis, a coronagraph designed to study the solar corona by providing an artificial solar eclipse. Metis features two channels working at the ultraviolet Lyman-α (121.6 nm) and in the visible light (580-640 nm). On-ground, the Metis radiometric performance has been tested using a flat-field panel (uniform illumination); the stability of the performance can be verified in-flight through the analysis of the stars passing in the Metis Field of View. Care must be taken to ensure the quality of the calibration, both before launch and for the long period associated with the space mission lifetime. For this reason, we are carrying out long period research of stars that cross the Field of View of Metis. In this paper, we describe the vignetting function acquired: on-ground, simulated via a raytracing code and in-flight derived from on-ground measurements (performing some adjustments to account for the real Metis flight configuration). These vignetting functions are then compared with the vignetting data derived from the passage of the star Theta Ophiuchi in March and December 2021. Additional presentation content can be accessed on the supplemental content page.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".