Geochemical characteristics of oils from the Sooner Trend Anadarko Basin, Canadian, and Kingfisher Counties and South-Central Oklahoma Oil Province plays, Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A total of 171 oils and 11 core plugs were collected from the Woodford Shale, the Mississippian Group, and the Springer Group reservoirs of the Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma. Geochemical variations in the oils led to the identification of four organic facies that could be mapped across the Sooner Trend Anadarko Basin, Canadian, and Kingfisher Counties (STACK) and South-Central Oklahoma Oil Province (SCOOP) plays. Oils produced from Woodford and Mississippian Group reservoirs were generated from three organic facies across the large-scale Woodford depositional system. The facies ranged from sediment-starved restricted marine in the Northwest Extension of STACK, shallow open marine in the core of STACK, and clay-rich open marine in SCOOP. In contrast, SCOOP oils produced from the Springer Group reservoirs were generated from a separate organic facies deposited in a clay-rich open marine depositional environment, probably the Caney or Goddard Shales. The vitrinite reflectance equivalent calculated from the methylphenanthrene index for oil samples ranged between 0.74% and 1.43%. A narrow zone of deep, volatile oil production in STACK West, associated with H2S production, contained relatively high concentrations of organic sulfur components, suggesting that deep fluids, possibly impacted by thermochemical sulfate reduction, may have migrated updip and mixed with lower-maturity oils. It would appear unlikely that Mississippian source rocks in STACK have made any serious contribution to the STACK oils. The outcome of the study confirms that most of the oils are produced from a Woodford source and have undergone short-distance migration to the reservoirs. This is manifested by positive relationships between numerous maturity parameters measured for the oils and the corresponding vitrinite reflectance equivalent values measured in the vicinity of production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".