Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette enquête montre comment la représentation dans le Mercure galant du ballet diplomatique entre Français, Britanniques et Autochtones en Amérique du Nord souffre d’un traitement inégal des acteurs en présence. Dans le contexte de la rivalité impériale exacerbée par la guerre de Succession d’Espagne (1701-1713), les ambassadeurs britanniques s’y voient systématiquement dénigrés, tant par les commentaires des correspondants du périodique que par les propos rapportés des représentants autochtones. Sans surprise, les émissaires de la France et leurs alliés sortent grands vainqueurs de cette mise en scène tendancieuse. À l’opposé, les comptes rendus de ces négociations consignés par les administrateurs britanniques, objets de la dernière partie de l’étude, donnent un tout autre tableau de ces échanges tripartites où les sujets du Roi-Soleil sont loin de tenir le plus beau rôle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".