MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384030191 · doi:10.5771/9783748942139-185

Kapitel 3: Evaluation der Erfahrungen in Colorado, Kalifornien und Kanada

2023· book-chapter· de· W4384030191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elian Pöplau

Bibliographic record

VenueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanCannabisPolitical sciencePublic administrationHistoryPsychologyArchaeologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study answers the question of whether an end to German cannabis prohibition can be achieved on the basis of practical experience. For this purpose, the study evaluates the concrete effects of legalisation in the US states of Colorado and California as well as in Canada and examines which developments result with regard to consumption, risk perception, health protection, road traffic, criminality and economy. In a second step, concrete proposals for the implementation of the German cannabis legalisation are given. The work clearly demonstrates that an end to cannabis prohibition can be achieved, which represents immense progress for German criminal policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooksSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207