MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384033938 · doi:10.29328/journal.jhcr.1001022

Mechanism of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Phagocytosis

2023· article· en· W4384033938 on OpenAlexaff
Loriamini Melika, Lewis-Bakker Melissa M, Beth Binnington, Lakshmi P. Kotra, Donald R. Branch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology and Clinical Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhagocytosisImmune systemAntibodyAutoimmune hemolytic anemiaOpsoninMonocyteImmunologyReceptorHemolytic anemiaBiologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune cytopenias occur when the body produces antibodies that target specific hematopoietic cells, inducing extravascular antibody-mediated phagocytosis by monocyte-macrophages in the spleen and/or liver through activation of Fcγ Receptors (FcγRs). Immune cytopenias include Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA), Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions (HTR), Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN), and Autoimmune Neutropenia (AIN). Thus, novel therapeutics that inhibit phagocytosis would be useful, especially for short-term use while other therapies are being evaluated. In our earlier studies, we successfully identified two small-molecule drugs able to inhibit in vitro phagocytosis with a low IC50 concentration and negligible toxicity. These drugs, known as KB-151 and KB-208, have the potential to be utilized as lead compounds for further studies, once their mechanism of action is more clearly understood. In this regard, we have developed preliminary results that suggest that these small molecules may bind to the Fc receptors on monocyte macrophages and block the subsequent attachment of antibody-opsonized red blood cells to prevent phagocytosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hematology and Clinical ResearchSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207