Durability of Functional Outcomes After MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of the Prostate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long-term data on functional outcomes after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) are limited. We assess the 5-year post-TULSA durability of outcomes for patient-reported genitourinary function, bowel function, and adverse events in 30 patients with primary, localized prostate cancer treated with TULSA across 3 centers. Patients received a conservative treatment plan in a phase 1 study designed to assess safety and feasibility. Follow-up visits took place at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and biannually up to 5 years. Median (interquartile range) age at baseline was 69 (67-71) years. Erectile dysfunction (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] ≤17) was prevalent at baseline, with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) score of 16 (12-19), decreasing to 9 (4-14) at 5 years. At the 5-year visit, 71% of men who attempted intercourse in the recall period reported preservation of IIEF Q2 ≥2 erections sufficient for penetration. The mean (95% CI) International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) decreased from 9.0 (7.0-11) to 7.1 (5.0-9.1) from baseline to 5 years; IPSS-quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine were stable or improved. Maintenance of bowel function and urinary continence was 100%. There was no new attributable serious or severe adverse event from 1 to 5 years. With a durably favorable safety profile, TULSA has the potential to treat cancer conservatively while simultaneously alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms. Data from larger studies are pending.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".