Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian academic Jordan Peterson and his Keralite counterpart C. Ravichandran have led their legion of followers into a rabbit hole of post-Heideggerian populism where the uncovering of artifice appeals to juvenile sensibilities. Peterson, with his quasi-Jungian posturing, insinuates a diabolical selfhood and self-presence that asserts the integral psyche of man. The rationalist leader C. Ravichandran draws upon Richard Dawkins’ arguments of biological determinism to justify fait accompli hierarchies. The self-reinforcement techniques of meditation peddled by such neo-gestalt gurus purports to bloom the proverbial lotus from the surrounding morass of suffering. Dialectical relations are sought to be subsumed into already existing givens. Thus, the Indic middle class secedes into outer space, on the wings of meditative self-aware bliss. The neo-advaitic holism, pseudo-Spinozist “non-alienation” and therapeutic aloofness on a mass scale, which is supposed to engender vibes conducive to peace and happiness, can also create solipsistic oases of affluence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.299 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".