Involvement of nucleus accumbens D2–medium spiny neurons projecting to the ventral pallidum in anxiety-like behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is a crucial brain region for emotionally relevant behaviours. The NAcc is mainly composed of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) expressing either dopamine receptor D1 (D1-MSNs) or D2 (D2-MSNs). The D1-MSNs project to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the ventral pallidum (VP), whereas the D2-MSNs project only to the VP. The D1- and D2-MSNs have been associated with depression-like behaviours, but their contribution to anxiety remains to be determined. METHODS: We used optogenetic tools to selectively manipulate D1-MSN projections from the NAcc core to the VP or VTA and D2-MSN projections to the VP during validated anxiety-producing behavioural procedures in naive mice. In addition, we assessed the effects of optical stimulation on neuronal activity using in vivo electrophysiologic recordings in anesthetized animals. RESULTS: Optogenetic activation of D1-MSN projections to the VTA or VP did not trigger anxiety-like behaviour. However, optical activation of D2-MSN projections to the VP significantly increased anxiety-like behaviour. This phenotype was associated with a decrease in the neuronal activity of putative GABAergic neurons in the VP. Importantly, pretreating D2-MSN-VP animals with the γ-aminobutyric acid modulator diazepam prevented the optically triggered anxiety-like behaviour. LIMITATIONS: The exclusive use of males in the behavioural tests limits broader interpretation of the findings. Although we used optogenetic conditions that trigger quasi-physiologic changes, there are caveats associated with the artificial manipulation of neuronal activity. CONCLUSION: The D2-MSN-VP projections contributed to the development of anxiety-like behaviour, through modulation of GABAergic activity in the VP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".