MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384071184 · doi:10.1080/07474938.2023.2225947

Automatic variable selection for semiparametric spatial autoregressive model

2023· article· en· W4384071184 on OpenAlexafffund
Fang Lü, Sisheng Liu, Jing Yang, Xuewen Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutoregressive modelEstimatorParametric statisticsSemiparametric modelApplied mathematicsModel selectionSemiparametric regressionMathematicsMonte Carlo methodMoment (physics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Parametric modelMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the generalized method of moment estimation of semiparametric varying coefficient partially linear spatial autoregressive model. The technique of profile least squares is employed and all estimators have explicit formulas which are computationally convenient. We derive the limiting distributions of the proposed estimators for both parametric and non parametric components. Variable selection procedures based on smooth-threshold estimating equations are proposed to automatically eliminate irrelevant parameters and zero varying coefficient functions. Compared to the alternative approaches based on shrinkage penalty, the new method is easily implemented. Oracle properties of the resulting estimators are established. Large amounts of Monte Carlo simulations confirm our theories and demonstrate that the estimators perform reasonably well in finite samples. We also apply the novel methods to an empirical data analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconometric ReviewsSame topicSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207