Th e age of detrital zircon from metasedimentary rocks of the Ternuvate strata (West Azov block of the Ukrainian Shield)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ternuvate strata comprise metamorphic rocks that make up the Haichur arcuate structure, which is about 72 km long. Its western part lies within the Andriivka fault zone, which separates the Vovcha and Huliaipole blocks, while the eastern part is located within the Ternuvate fault zone, traced on the Remivka block. The rocks composing the Haichur structure have irregular and laterally variable composition, changeable thickness, and exhibit dynamometamorphic structures of boudinage and schistosity. The upper part of the Ternuvate strata mainly consists of metasedimentary rocks, including gneisses, biotite schists, garnet-biotite, magnetite-amphibole, and feldspar quartzites. The lower part comprises volcanogenic rocks such as amphibolites, metaultrabasites, and biotite-amphibole gneisses. Using the LA-ICP-MS method, 38 zircon crystals from muscovite-biotite gneisses in the upper part of the Ternuvate strata were analyzed. Based on the geochemical data, these zircons are metamorphosed graywackes. The zircon crystals belong to several age populations (3.65-3.45 and 3.3-2.95 Ga), corresponding to the major stages of Archean crust formation in the West Azov domain, including the formation of the oldest basement and granite-greenstone complexes of the Paleoarchean and Mesoarchean ages. Identical populations of detrital zircon were found in the early Precambrian metaterrigenous rocks of the Krutobalka Formation in the Sorokyne greenstone structure. The correspondence between the Paleoarchean crust (3.45-3.65 Ga) of the West Azov block of the Ukrainian Shield and the Kursk-Besedine granulite-gneiss area of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly block is evident, while the Paleoarchean and Mesoarchean complexes (2.9-3.3 Ga) correspond to the Mykhailivka and Orel-Tim granite-greenstone area of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly block. The Archean complexes of Sarmatia are of the same age as similar formations in the Kaapvaal craton in South Africa, Bastar craton in India, North China Craton, Slave craton in Canada, and others, which formed during the Eoarchaean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".