Entre raison et passion : l’expérience des pédagogues lors de la formation et de l’application du projet PhiloJeunes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building on the mission of Quebec schools which consists of educating, socializing and qualifying, the PhiloJeunes project, established in Quebec since 2015, works to strengthen protective factors in the face of violent radicalization through the implementation of a philosophical practice in class. This article is based on a qualitative study carried out with teachers involved in this educational project, in order to explore their experience during the training and application of said project. The analysis highlights the challenges and levers encountered by educators, particularly with regard to a certain normative prescription/proscription regarding the expression and circulation of emotions. The inevitable overlap between the rational sphere and the emotional sphere leads the authors to support, in the vein of the legacy of John Dewey, an overcoming of this outdated opposition, in order to embrace a sensitive democratic education which can promote the realization of objectives of preventing violent radicalization through philosophical discussion in a school context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".