MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384072769 · doi:10.31518/2618-9100-2023-3-17

Russian Professional Artists of the 19th Century in China

2023· article· en· W4384072769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Limei Duo

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Courier · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPortraitCreativityPaintingPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)Chinese artVisual artsArtArt historyHistoryPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the activities and achievements of the first Russian professional artist of the 19 th century.Anton Mikhailovich Legashev in China through a portrait of a Chinese official painted by him, stored at the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada.On the one hand, A.M. Legashev tried to realize breakthroughs in self-realization and artistic creativity through the paintings he created during his stay in China, at the same time he served the tsarist government and carried out a political mission to explore China.A.M. Legashev's surviving paintings played an important role in visualizing the construction of cultural exchanges between China and Russia.Keywords: Russian artist, spiritual mission in Beijing, collection of the Canadian Museum, cultural exchanges between China and Russia. The article has been received by the editor on

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical CourierSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207