MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384081144 · doi:10.4000/rhc.2828

Les usages du passé sur les murals d’Irlande du Nord 

2022· article· fr· W4384081144 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Colantonio

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire culturelle · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les quartiers populaires de Belfast et Derry, depuis les années 1980, des centaines de peintures murales républicaines et unionistes diffusent des messages politiques, commémorent des événements et célèbrent des martyrs. Elles constituent à la fois un art de propagande, une modalité de la lutte, une incitation à la mobilisation et un support privilégié où se déclinent les imaginaires communautaires et se dévoilent les constructions identitaires. Cette enquête retrace l’histoire du muralisme politique dans la province en privilégiant les fresques qui font référence au passé, largement convoqué, d’abord pour entretenir les antagonismes et justifier l’affrontement, puis, depuis le milieu des années 1990, pour accompagner le processus de paix. L’article examine en particulier la tension entre le désir de penser un futur moins conflictuel et la volonté de maintenir bien visibles les raisons de la colère. Les murals les plus récents témoignent de l’évolution des sujets représentés et des pratiques, de la persistance de leur fonction identitaire et du renforcement de leur dimension patrimoniale, dans une société toujours fortement polarisée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire culturelleSame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207