Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Discovery of the Unconscious (publié aux États-Unis en 1970) d’Henri Ellenberger est l’un des essais fondateurs de l’histoire culturelle de la psychanalyse, de la psychiatrie, des pratiques psychothérapeutiques et des doctrines psychologiques. Or Ellenberger est, on le sait peu, un médecin formé en France qui a fait une carrière universitaire en sciences sociales au Canada. Sa première passion dans les années 1930 va pour les méthodes de l’anthropologie sociale, bien avant de se tourner vers l’histoire, au seuil des années 1950. Pour la première fois, une analyse fondée sur des documents d’archives et les publications d’Ellenberger sur la piété populaire dans le Poitou le présente comme un collaborateur de l’ethnographe Arnold van Gennep, une rencontre qui a fortement déterminé sa manière de concevoir l’histoire culturelle. Ma contribution s’attache aux correspondances qui existent entre les travaux d’Ellenberger relatifs aux croyances et aux pratiques de médecine populaire, et les études culturelles qui irriguent The Discovery of the Unconscious.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".