MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384120406 · doi:10.1177/14782715231184518

Giant cell arteritis: An interesting case presentation

2023· article· en· W4384120406 on OpenAlexaff
Lin CMA, Lorenzi AR, Cooles FAH

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsGiant cell arteritisMedicineNeurosyphilisSyphilisHeadachesArteritisDermatologyVasculitisPathologyBiopsyDiseaseSurgeryImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), otherwise known as temporal arteritis, is a form of large vessel vasculitis. Patients may present with a variety of symptoms but the most common include headaches, jaw claudication, fatigue, night sweats and visual disturbance. Diagnosis is made using a combination of temporal artery ultrasound, clinical findings and blood tests and the diagnostic gold standard of a temporal artery biopsy and is sometimes needed for histopathological confirmation. Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease caused by the spirochaete Treponema pallidum, which can infect the central nervous system and cause neurosyphilis, which can mimic GCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of EdinburghSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207