MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Implementation of a Topologically Optimized Heat Sink for Non-Uniform Heat Fluxes in an Electric-Vehicle Fast-Charger

2023· article· en· W4384129924 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Palumbo, Omri Tayyara, Seyed Amir Assadi, Carlos M. Da Silva, Olivier Trescases, Cristina H. Amon, S. Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat sinkThermal resistanceMaterials scienceThermalSink (geography)Heat fluxHeat spreaderJunction temperatureAluminiumHeat transferMechanical engineeringNuclear engineeringMechanicsThermodynamicsComposite materialEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-power electrical topologies, typically employed in power conversion systems such as electric vehicle (EV) charg-ers, often utilize several discrete power semiconductor devices with varying electrical loads and material properties, resulting in non-uniform heat fluxes. Due to manufacturing limitations, commercially available heat sinks are designed to reduce overall device temperature but cannot provide an application-specific solution to target these non-uniform heat fluxes. This work utilizes a novel additive manufacturing technique using wire-arc thermal spray to fabricate a topologically optimized heat sink for cooling an EV fast charger. The heat sink is designed to reduce the temperature differences in power semiconductor devices with non-uniform heat fluxes. A modified commercially available heat sink containing a copper tube embedded in an aluminum plate is used as a baseline and compared to the proposed design. Experimental results demonstrate that the optimized heat sink yields a 27% reduction in average thermal resistance from the cooling fluid to the surface of the heat sink under each device and a 25% reduction in maximum heat sink surface temperature difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207