MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384133663 · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104436

Generating synthetic clinical data that capture class imbalanced distributions with generative adversarial networks: Example using antiretroviral therapy for HIV

2023· article· en· W4384133663 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas I-Hsien Kuo, Féderico García, Anders Sönnerborg, Michael Böhm, Rolf Kaiser, Maurizio Zazzi, Mark N. Polizzotto, Louisa Jorm, Sebastiano Barbieri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Informatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceAutoencoderAdversarial systemClass (philosophy)Data miningArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Clinical data's confidential nature often limits the development of machine learning models in healthcare. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can synthesise realistic datasets, but suffer from mode collapse, resulting in low diversity and bias towards majority demographics and common clinical practices. This work proposes an extension to the classic GAN framework that includes a variational autoencoder (VAE) and an external memory mechanism to overcome these limitations and generate synthetic data accurately describing imbalanced class distributions commonly found in clinical variables. METHODS: The proposed method generated a synthetic dataset related to antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (ART for HIV). We evaluated it based on five metrics: (1) accurately representing imbalanced class distribution; (2) the realism of the individual variables; (3) the realism among variables; (4) patient disclosure risk; and (5) the utility of the generated dataset for developing downstream machine learning models. RESULTS: The proposed method overcomes the issue of mode collapse and generates a synthetic dataset that accurately describes imbalanced class distributions commonly found in clinical variables. The generated data has a patient disclosure risk of 0.095%, lower than the 9% threshold stated by Health Canada and the European Medicines Agency, making it suitable for distribution to the research community with high security. The generated data also has high utility, indicating the potential of the proposed method to enable the development of downstream machine learning algorithms for healthcare applications using synthetic data. CONCLUSION: Our proposed extension to the classic GAN framework, which includes a VAE and an external memory mechanism, represents a promising approach towards generating synthetic data that accurately describe imbalanced class distributions commonly found in clinical variables. This method overcomes the limitations of GANs and creates more realistic datasets with higher patient cohort diversity, facilitating the development of downstream machine learning algorithms for healthcare applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical InformaticsSame topicImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207