MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384154882 · doi:10.1126/science.abn3445

The central role of density functional theory in the AI age

2023· review· en· W4384154882 on OpenAlexaff
Bing Huang, Guido Falk von Rudorff, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity functional theoryContext (archaeology)Relevance (law)Computer scienceTransferabilityScalabilityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData scienceLearning theoryChemistryBiologyPsychologyCognitive psychologyComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Density functional theory (DFT) plays a pivotal role in chemical and materials science because of its relatively high predictive power, applicability, versatility, and computational efficiency. We review recent progress in machine learning (ML) model developments, which have relied heavily on DFT for synthetic data generation and for the design of model architectures. The general relevance of these developments is placed in a broader context for chemical and materials sciences. DFT-based ML models have reached high efficiency, accuracy, scalability, and transferability and pave the way to the routine use of successful experimental planning software within self-driving laboratories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations226
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207