Age and origin of Early Cretaceous magmatism in the southernmost Omineca Belt, northern U.S. Cordillera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present results of a geochronological and geochemical study of the Kaniksu batholith, located in northern Idaho and Washington near the Canadian border. This batholith occurs at the southern end of the Omineca Belt and forms an integral part of the Priest River metamorphic complex. The Kaniksu batholith is compositionally diverse, but granitoids can be grouped into a volumetrically major peraluminous and metaluminous suite and a volumetrically minor alkalic suite based on lithology and major-element composition; additional compositionally similar alkalic plutons extend far to the south of the main footprint of the batholith. Laser ablation−inductively coupled plasma−mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U-Pb zircon dating revealed that most granitoids of the batholith formed in the Early Cretaceous between 120 Ma and 100 Ma, although magmatism continued until ca. 73 Ma. The dominance of Early Cretaceous ages closely matches magmatic age distributions elsewhere in the Omineca Belt. There is no clear relationship between age and suite assignment or other geochemical characteristics. Whole-rock Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope data along with zircon Hf isotope data suggest that the alkalic and metaluminous suites can largely be explained as mixtures of partial melts from the Mesoproterozoic Moyie sills and metasedimentary rocks of the Belt Supergroup, whereas a third component, perhaps Paleoproterozoic or Neoarchean meta-igneous basement, is required to explain the origin of the peraluminous suite. All of these granitoids formed well behind the Cordilleran arc front in an area characterized by multiple episodes of crustal thickening. As there is little evidence of contemporaneous mantle-derived magmatism, crustal thickening was probably the main driver of batholith formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".