Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tables and Figures TABLES 1 Single men and women in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia living in rural and urban areas, 1871 / 36 2 Massachusetts cities with the greatest number of Maritime-born residents, 1885 / 38 3 Age of single Maritime women in Boston, 1880 / 43 4 Relationship to head of household of single Maritime women in Boston, 1880 / 54 5 Distribution by ward of single Maritime women in Boston, 1880 / 55 6 Estimates of population change in the Maritime provinces and Canada, 1901-31 / 67 7 Maritime men and women in Boston, 1905 and 1915 / 68 8 Men and women in the Maritime provinces living in rural and urban areas, 1921 / 71 9 Location of farms of families of single Maritime women in Boston, 1901 / 80 10 Types of occupations of single Maritime women, 1880, and single English-Canadian women, 1910 and 1920, Boston / 87 viii Tables and Figures 11 Relationship to head of household of single Maritime women, 1880, and single English-Canadian women, 1910 and 1920, Boston /no FIGURES 1 Massachusetts cities with the greatest number of Maritime-born residents, 1885 / 39 2 Boston, 1880, showing ward divisions and areas annexed 1860-80 / 44 3 Commercial transportation links between the Maritime provinces and Boston,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.743 | 0.468 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".