Effects of spatial dimensionality and band tilting on the longitudinal optical conductivities in Dirac bands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a unified theory based on linear response, for analyzing the longitudinal optical conductivity (LOC) of materials with tilted Dirac cones. Depending on the tilt parameter $t$, the Dirac electrons have four phases: untilted, type I, type II, and type III; the Dirac dispersion can be isotropic or anisotropic; the spatial dimension of the material can be one, two, or three dimensions (1D, 2D, or 3D). The interband LOCs and intraband LOCs in $d$ dimension (with $d\ensuremath{\ge}2)$ are found to scale as ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\omega}}^{d\ensuremath{-}2}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{d\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\omega})$, respectively, where $\ensuremath{\omega}$ is the frequency and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the chemical potential. The interband LOC vanishes in 1D due to lack of extra spatial dimension. In contrast, the interband LOCs in 2D and 3D are nonvanishing and share many similar properties. A universal and robust fixed point of interband LOCs appears at $\ensuremath{\omega}=2\ensuremath{\mu}$ no matter $d=2$ or $d=3$, which can be intuitively understood by the geometric structures of Fermi surface and energy resonance contour. The intraband LOCs and the carrier density for 2D and 3D tilted Dirac bands are both closely related to the geometric structure of Fermi surface and the cutoff of integration. The angular dependence of LOCs is found to characterize both spatial dimensionality and band tilting and the constant asymptotic background values of LOC reflect features of Dirac bands. The LOCs in the anisotropic tilted Dirac cone can be connected to its isotropic counterpart by a ratio that consists of Fermi velocities for both 2D and 3D. Most of the findings are universal for tilted Dirac materials and hence valid for a great many Dirac materials in the spatial dimensions of physical interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".