MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384210692 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2023.070605

Ideological and Political Education of College Students in the New Media Environment—Taking Haiyuan College of Kunming Medical University as an Example

2023· article· en· W4384210692 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Li, Hao Yang, Xiao Hua Wang, Juan Yang, Lingyan Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyPolitical educationPoliticsSociologyOrder (exchange)Public relationsPedagogyPolitical scienceLawBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the current new media environment, new development possibilities and new challenges have emerged in the teaching methods, teaching contents, ideological and political value orientation and other modules of college students' ideological and political education. However, there are also many problems and weaknesses to be solved in the implementation and practice of the current ideological and political education for college students. Therefore, if colleges and universities want to overcome the drawbacks and problems of ideological and political education of college students under the current new media environment, they need to actively explore innovative ways of ideological and political education, improve the effective guarantee institutions for students' ideological and political education, and skillfully penetrate the elements of the development of the times, in order to strengthen the faculty of ideological and political education, enrich the methods of ideological and political education in combination with the new media environment, and cultivate students to establish correct ideological and political awareness. We should let the effect of college students' ideological and political education be further improved and enhanced in the new media environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207