Plasmonic Bullseye Nanocavities for Broadband Light Localization and Multi‐Wavelength SERS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plasmonic nanostructures capable of broadband light trapping and field enhancement have promising applications in a wide range of fields. This study presents a platform for broadband, polarization‐independent field enhancement in the visible regime through the use of width‐graded nanocavities in a bullseye configuration. The fabrication procedure utilizes electron beam lithography (EBL) to achieve fine control over the nanocavity geometry and template stripping to enable rapid and low‐cost production. The utility of these devices as substrates for multi‐wavelength surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is demonstrated through molecular detection in a 10 μM solution at two excitation wavelengths. The impact of bullseye geometry on both the broadband spectral response and multi‐wavelength SERS performance is examined. The measured SERS enhancement factor (EF) is shown to depend primarily on the plasmonically active surface area of the device, regardless of the local electromagnetic field strength within the nanocavities. These results highlight not only the utility of the width‐graded bullseye as a broadband platform for SERS and other applications but also provide design guidelines to optimize the enhancement factor and broadband performance of similar devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it