MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384343170 · doi:10.3390/s23146392

A New Monitoring Technology for Bearing Fault Detection in High-Speed Trains

2023· article· en· W4384343170 on OpenAlexaff
Sitong Sun, Sheng Zhang, Wilson Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Fault (geology)VibrationSIGNAL (programming language)Fault detection and isolationEnvelope (radar)Signal processingEnvelope detectorModalComputer scienceTrainEngineeringModal analysisElectronic engineeringAcousticsArtificial intelligenceDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a new monitoring system is developed for bearing fault detection in high-speed trains. Firstly, a data acquisition system is developed to collect vibration and other related signals wirelessly. Secondly, a new multiple correlation analysis (MCA) technique is proposed for bearing fault detection. The MCA technique consists of the three processing steps: (1) the collected vibration signal is decomposed by variational modal decomposition (VMD) to formulate the representative intrinsic mode functions (IMFs); (2) the MCA is used to process and identify the characteristic features for signal analysis; (3) bearing fault is diagnosed by examining bearing characteristic frequency information on the envelope power spectrum. The effectiveness of the proposed MCA fault detection technique is verified by experimental tests corresponding to different bearing conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207