MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384398097 · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6655

Report on scipost_202212_00004v1

2023· peer-review· en· W4384398097 on OpenAlexafffund
Weicheng Ye, Liujun Zou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Symmetry acting on a (2+1)D topological order can be anomalous in the sense that they possess an obstruction to being realized as a purely (2+1)D on-site symmetry.In this paper, we develop a (3+1)D topological quantum field theory to calculate the anomaly indicators of a (2+1)D topological order with a general symmetry group G, which may be discrete or continuous, Abelian or non-Abelian, contain anti-unitary elements or not, and permute anyons or not.These anomaly indicators are partition functions of the (3+1)D topological quantum field theory on a specific manifold equipped with some G-bundle, and they are expressed using the data characterizing the topological order and the symmetry actions.Our framework is applied to derive the anomaly indicators for various symmetry groups, including, where Z2 and Z T 2 denote a unitary and anti-unitary order-2 group, respectively, and O(N ) T denotes a symmetry group O(N ) such that elements in O(N ) with determinant -1 are anti-unitary.In particular, we demonstrate that some anomaly of O(N ) T and SO(N ) × Z T 2 exhibit symmetry-enforced gaplessness, i.e., they cannot be realized by any symmetry-enriched topological order.As a byproduct, for SO(N ) symmetric topological orders, we derive their SO(N ) Hall conductance. Contents I. Introduction1 A. Relation to prior work 3 B. Outline and summary 4 II.Review of topological order with symmetry G 4 A. Review of UMTC notation 4 B. Global symmetry 5 III.(3+1)D TQFT with finite group symmetry G 7 A. Characterizing the anomaly by bulk-boundary correspondence 8 B. General construction of TQFT 8 C. Handle decomposition 11 D. Recipe for calculating the partition function 12 IV.Examples: finite group symmetry 15 A. No symmetry 15 B. Z T 2 16 C.Z 2 × Z 2 17 D. Z T 2 × Z T 2 19 1. All-fermion Z 2 topological order 20 V. Generalization to connected Lie group symmetry 23 A. Example: SO(N ) 24 1.Anomaly indicator for N 5 26 2. SO(N ) Hall conductance 26 VI.Other symmetry groups 27 A. O(N ) T 28 B. SO(N ) × Z T 2 30 VII. Discussion 31 A. Derivation of Eq. (44) 33 1.Vector Spaces 33 2. Partition functions 34 3. Inner Products 35 4. Requirement from Invertibility 36 B. An explicit expression of the η-factor 36 C. Consistency check of TQFT 37 1.Independence on the handle decomposition 37 2. Invariance under change of defects 41 3. Gauge invariance 43 4. Cobordism invariance 44 5. Invertibility 45 6. Generalization to connected Lie groups 45 D. Identifying the manifold M from bordism 46 E.More information about handle decomposition of manifolds 47 1.CP 2 48 2. RP 4 48 3. RP 3 × S 1 48 4. RP 2 × RP 2 49

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9430.892

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207