Microbiological and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin-Susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Isolated in Lung Transplant Perioperative Donor and Recipient Respiratory Cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common organisms isolated from respiratory secretions in lung transplant donors and recipients perioperatively. Within the first 90 days after lung transplantation, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections have been associated with increased mortality and acute and chronic rejection. However, it is unclear whether respiratory cultures positive for MSSA at the time of transplantation can lead to clinically significant infection. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological and clinical outcomes for lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with positive perioperative donor or/and recipient respiratory cultures for MSSA. A retrospective study was conducted evaluating MSSA-positive respiratory cultures at the time of lung transplantation from donors and/or recipients from January 1, 2008, to December 30, 2019. Patients who did not have a bronchoalveolar lavage at 2 weeks after the lung transplant or died within 2 weeks of lung transplant were excluded. The main outcome was MSSA eradication at 2-week bronchoscopy. Recipients were evaluated for MSSA infections at the 12-week period after the transplant. Of the 1,678 individuals who underwent lung transplantation, 218 LTRs had S. aureus isolated in perioperative donor or recipient respiratory cultures, and 29 were subsequently excluded. Of the remaining 189 LTRs, MSSA eradication at the 2-week bronchoscopy was achieved in 186 (98.4%) recipients. During the 12-week follow-up, 15 (7.9%) recipients were diagnosed with MSSA pneumonia; concurrent MSSA bacteremia was noted in one recipient. No anastomotic infection, empyema, or lung abscess related to MSSA was diagnosed during the follow-up period. In LTRs, the rate of MSSA eradication at 2-week post-transplant recipients is high, and it is associated with a low rate of infectious complication within the first 12 weeks after transplant. Most of the recipients received a combination therapy with at least one agent active against MSSA. More studies to evaluate the optimal antimicrobial stewardship policies regarding the regimen and duration of antibiotic therapy for these patients are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".