MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384405368 · doi:10.54471/moderasi.v3i1.40

Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam: Studi Komparasi Pendidikan Multikultural Indonesia dan Kanada

2023· article· en· W4384405368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModerasi Journal of Islamic Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismDignityIslamic educationMulticultural educationIslamDiversity (politics)Political scienceSociologyPedagogyGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicultural education in developed countries (Indonesia and Canada), especially in basic education, wants education that upholds human dignity by respecting and understanding the differences that each individual has. Comparison of multicultural education (Indonesia and Canada) First, each developed country (Indonesia and Canada) has similarities in multicultural education, namely wanting to eradicate acts of discrimination and uphold human rights fairly. Second,differences in multicultural education in Indonesia give a role to the Principal in monitoring the diversity of each student. In Canada, implementing multicultural education involves implementing an educational model that reconstructs cultural diversity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it