Bibliographic record
Abstract

 Patient portals allow users to access, manage, and share their health information online.
 Patient portals are available in 6 provinces: Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, and Quebec.
 Patient portals in Canada are implemented at the provincial, regional, or clinic level of the health care system, and vary in the health data and features that are shared with users.
 Medical imaging reports are shared on portals in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan. In Saskatchewan and Alberta, reports are available immediately, whereas Quebec has a 30-day embargo period. Ontario has an intention to enable patient portals to share medical images from provincial diagnostic imaging repositories in the future.
 A tailored approach may be considered when timing the release of medical imaging results due to concerns related to patient anxiety, especially for individuals waiting for diagnostic results of potentially life-threatening or serious conditions.
 Radiologists can use lay language in their reports and provide users with reliable sources of information to increase understanding of complex results. They may develop or take advantage of existing patient-friendly templates for sharing results on portals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".