MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384447604 · doi:10.5194/acp-23-7767-2023

Atmospheric oxidation of new “green” solvents – Part 2: methyl pivalate and pinacolone

2023· article· en· W4384447604 on OpenAlexaff
Caterina Mapelli, James K. Donnelly, Andrew R. Rickard, Abbie T. Robinson, Con Robert McElroy, Basile F. E. Curchod, Daniel Hollas, Terry J. Dillon

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHorizon 2020Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsChemistryPhotodissociationPhotochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Reaction rateMedicinal chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Lab-based experimental and computational methods were used to study the atmospheric degradation of two promising “green” solvents: pinacolone, (CH3)3CC(O)CH3, and methyl pivalate, (CH3)3CC(O)OCH3. Pulsed laser photolysis coupled to pulsed laser-induced fluorescence was used to determine absolute rate coefficients (in 10−12 cm3 molec.−1 s−1) of k1(297 K) = (1.2 ± 0.2) for OH + (CH3)3CC(O)CH3 (Reaction R1) and k2(297 K) = (1.3 ± 0.2) for OH + (CH3)3CC(O)OCH3 (Reaction R2), in good agreement with one previous experimental study. Rate coefficients for both reactions were found to increase at elevated temperature, with k1(T) adequately described by k1(297–485 K) = 2.1 × 10−12 exp(-200/T) cm3 molec.−1 s−1. k2(T) exhibited more complex behaviour, with a local minimum at around 300 K. In the course of this work, k3(295–450 K) was obtained for the well-characterised reaction OH + C2H5OH (ethanol; Reaction R3), in satisfactory agreement with the evaluated literature. UV–Vis spectroscopy experiments and computational calculations were used to explore cross-sections for (CH3)3CC(O)CH3 photolysis (Reaction R4), while (CH3)3CC(O)OCH3 showed no sign of absorption over the wavelengths of interest. Absorption cross-sections for (CH3)3CC(O)CH3, σ4(λ), in the actinic region were larger, and the maximum was red-shifted compared to estimates (methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) values) used in current state-of-science models. As a consequence, we note that photolysis (Reaction R4) is likely the dominant pathway for removal of (CH3)3CC(O)CH3 from the troposphere. Nonetheless, large uncertainties remain as quantum yields φ4(λ) remain unmeasured. Lifetime estimates based upon Reactions (R1) and (R4) span the range 2–9 d and are consequently associated with a poorly constrained estimated photochemical ozone creation potential (POCPE). In accord with previous studies, (CH3)3CC(O)OCH3 did not absorb in the actinic region, allowing for straightforward calculation of an atmospheric lifetime of ≈ 9 d and a small POCPE ≈ 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→