Influence of Stefan blowing and variable thermal conductivity in magnetized flow of Sutterby nanofluid through porous medium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The classical viscous theory is limited to illustrating the characteristics of several materials like pseudoplastic and dilatant fluids. Sutterby fluid has the features of shear thinning and shear thickening fluids because of its Power law index. Therefore, this study considered an incompressible, time-independent and electrically conducting Sutterby fluid flow across a rotating and stretchable disk. The disk experiences the effect of porous space. The energy equation has variable conductivity, heat source and thermal relaxation time features while mass equation exploits the influence of chemical reaction. The aspects of Buongiorno nanofluid theory are also examined in the Sutterby flow model. The phenomenon of Stefan blowing is analysed through mass transfer rate at the surface of disk. The flow expressions are first transferred into a new system of single independent variable and then treated numerically via Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg (RKF) method combined through shooting process. The behaviour of distinguished physical quantities is discussed graphically on momentum, mass species and thermal fields. The numeric data of drag force, Sherwood number and Nusselt number is calculated against several physical parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it