Outcomes among youth attending inpatient treatment for co‐occurring disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: An emerging body of research is identifying effective outpatient integrated treatment approaches for youth with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, though few studies exist examining inpatient treatment. The current study aimed to address this gap by examining response to treatment during admission to, and in the year following discharge from, a specialized inpatient program for youth with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: A single-cohort longitudinal design examined change in adaptive functioning, mental health symptoms, and substance use frequency among N = 142 youth (69.1% female) aged 14-21 (M = 16.9, SD = 1.5) attending the program. Participants completed self-report measures at admission, discharge, and 1-, 6- and 12-months post-discharge. RESULTS: Analyses indicated significant improvements in adaptive functioning, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and substance use frequency during admission. There was some loss of gains in adaptive functioning over the 12-months post-discharge. Improvements were maintained in internalizing symptoms and substance use frequency, and improvements in externalizing symptoms continued over the 12-months post-discharge. There was no significant interaction between change in functioning and internalizing symptoms at admission or type of substance use disorder diagnosis. There was a significant interaction with externalizing symptoms, such that those with clinically significant levels of externalizing symptoms at admission experienced greater improvement in functioning, though the groups ended treatment with comparable functioning scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide preliminary support for integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders delivered in an inpatient setting. However, the results also reflect the significant needs of youth with co-occurring disorders and the importance of ongoing care post-discharge from intensive treatment settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".