MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384497971 · doi:10.1017/9781800107045.001

The Rural Population of Bedfordshire, 1671-1921

2023· other· en· W4384497971 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lydia M. Marshall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExchequerNoticeReceiptQuarter (Canadian coin)LawHearthPopulationBusinessFinanceEconomic historyAccountingEconomicsPolitical scienceHistorySociologyArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hearth tax was imposed by 13 and 14 Car. II, c. 10, which enacted that from March 25th, 1662, “every dwelling and other house, edifice and all lodgings and chambers in Inns of Court, Innes of Chancery, colledges and other societies… shall be chargeable for every firehearth and stove the sum of twoe shillings by the yeare,” to be paid in two half yearly instalments. Machinery for assessment and collection was fully laid down in the Act. The onus of making the original return rested upon the occupier, who was required, upon receipt of notice from the petty constable, to render an account in writing of all hearths within his dwelling. This done, the constable was to enter the house to check the statement and was then to deliver up a return, at the next Quarter Sessions, of all assessed, together with the names of those who refused to comply with the order. Finally, the Clerk of the Peace was to enrol all returns and to prepare a duplicate, which, duly signed and sealed by three or more Justices, was to be sent into the Exchequer. The collection of the tax in the first place was to be made by the petty constable, who was empowered to distrain on the goods of those refusing to pay. From him the money passed to the High Constable, thence to the sheriff, and finally to the Exchequer, small deductions being made at each stage for the reward of persons engaged in assessment and collection. Exemption was granted automatically to those who were in receipt of alms, or who, by reason of poverty, were not liable to the usual taxes to church and poor; also, upon certificate, to persons inhabiting houses of less than 20/- annual value and not possessing lands or chattels worth that sum. Certain types of hearths, such as blowing houses, private ovens, and kilns were also exempt, as were almshouses of less than £100 yearly revenue. The tax was to be chargeable upon the occupier only, and not upon the landlord. The Act was twice modified, on both occasions with a view of increasing the revenue arising therefrom, and of preventing evasion. The first amendment (15 Car. II, c. 13) provided for a system of checks at each stage of assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIrish and British Studies→French-language works237,207→