Bibliographic record
Abstract
organisations.Wesley and Maksymetz's examination of regional campaign directors demonstrated the important role these individuals play, implementing national strategy and feeding information back to the central party.They make it clear that this role is an important element of an increasingly centralised campaigning.Likewise, Koop and Sayers note that local campaign managers now must manage not only their volunteers and their candidate, but also their relationship with the central party office.Although it has admirably captured many of the dimensions of diversity in contemporary Canadian politics, the volume was strangely silent on the distinctive aspects of local constituency organising and campaigning among racialised communities.Waves of immigration have rendered major Canadian cities some of the most ethnically diverse places on the globe.Canada's single-member electoral system has created significant opportunities for geographically-concentrated diasporic communities to organize politically.While the collection included some discussion of diversity among candidates, it was largely silent on the complexities and opportunities entailed in local campaigns and election administration in these diverse urban centers.For scholars, practitioners and students interested in Canadian electoral politics on the ground, Inside the Local Campaign is a welcome resource.Its range of wellresearched and highly readable chapters make it suitable for both scholarly and more general audiences.Its contributions to our understanding of local campaigning in an age of data-driven and digital politics promise to spark new interest in the local dimensions of elections in Canada and other places that hold elections using single-member systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".