MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384524063 · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-23-0057.1

Uncertainty Quantification of Deep Learning–Based Statistical Downscaling of Climatic Parameters

2023· article· en· W4384524063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vahid Nourani, Kasra Khodkar, Aida Hosseini Baghanam, Sameh A. Kantoush, İbrahim Demir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDisaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto UniversityJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsDownscalingClimatologyEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationCoupled model intercomparison projectClimate modelClimate changeGeneral Circulation ModelMeteorologyForcing (mathematics)Representative Concentration PathwaysComputer scienceGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigated the uncertainty involved in statistical downscaling of hydroclimatic time series obtained by artificial neural networks (ANNs). Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) general circulation model (GCM) Canadian Earth System Model, version 5 (CanESM5), was used as large-scale predictor data for downscaling temperature and precipitation parameters. Two ANNs, feed forward and long short-term memory (LSTM), were utilized for statistical downscaling. To quantify the uncertainty of downscaling, prediction intervals (PIs) were estimated via the lower upper bound estimation (LUBE) method. To assess performance of proposed models in different climate regimes, data from the Tabriz and Rasht stations in Iran were employed. The calibrated models via historical GCM data were used for future projections via the high-forcing and fossil fuel–driven development scenario shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) 5-8.5. Projections were compared with the Canadian Regional Climate Model 4 (Can-RCM4) projections via the same scenario. Results indicated that both LSTM-based point predictions and PIs are more accurate than the feedforward neural network (FFNN)-based predictions, with an average of 55% higher Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) for point predictions and 25% lower coverage width criterion (CWC) for PIs. Projections suggested that Tabriz is going to experience a warmer climate with an increase in average temperature of 2° and 5°C for near and far futures, respectively, and a drier climate with a 20% decrease in precipitation until 2100. Future projections for the Rasht station, however, suggested a more uniform climate with less seasonal variability. Average precipitation will increase by up to 25% and 70% until near and far future periods, respectively. Ultimately, point predictions show that the average temperature in Rasht will increase by 1°C until the near future and then be a constant average temperature until the far future. Significance Statement The downscaling of hydroclimatic parameters is subject to uncertainty. The best way is to provide an area with the highest contingency of them as a prediction interval. The reduction width of such an interval leads to increased confidence in explaining and predicting these processes. We proposed and applied a deep learning–based machine learning method for both point prediction and prediction interval estimation of temperature and precipitation parameters for the future over two different climatic regions. The results show the superiority of such a machine learning–based prediction interval estimation for quantification of the downscaling uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Meteorology and ClimatologySame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207